Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Estimating aboveground net biomass change for tropical and subtropical forests: Refinement of IPCC default rates using forest plot data
Authors: Requena Suarez, Daniela
Rozendaal, Danaë M. A.
De Sy, Veronique
Phillips, Oliver L.
Alvarez‐Dávila, Esteban
Anderson‐Teixeira, Kristina
Arroyo, Luzmila
Baker, Timothy R.
Bongers, Frans
Brienen, Roel J. W.
Carter, Sarah
Cook‐Patton, Susan C.
Feldpausch, Ted R.
Griscom, Bronson W.
Harris, Nancy
Hérault, Bruno
Honorio Coronado, Eurídice N.
Leavitt, Sara M.
Lewis, Simon L.
Marimon, Beatriz S.
Monteagudo Mendoza, Abel
Kassi N'dja, Justin
Estelle N'Guessan, Anny
Poorter, Lourens
Qie, Lan
Rutishauser, Ervan
Sist, Plinio
Sonké, Bonaventure
Sullivan, Martin J. P.
Vilanova, Emilio
Wang, Maria M. H.
Martius, Christopher
Herold, Martin
Keywords: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Issue Date: Oct-2019
Publisher: Wiley
Citation: Global Change Biology,Volume25, Issue11 November 2019 Pages (3609-3624).
Abstract: As countries advance in greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting for climate change mitigation, consistent estimates of aboveground net biomass change (∆AGB) are needed. Countries with limited forest monitoring capabilities in the tropics and subtropics rely on IPCC 2006 default ∆AGB rates, which are values per ecological zone, per continent. Similarly, research into forest biomass change at a large scale also makes use of these rates. IPCC 2006 default rates come from a handful of studies, provide no uncertainty indications and do not distinguish between older secondary forests and old‐growth forests. As part of the 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, we incorporate ∆AGB data available from 2006 onwards, comprising 176 chronosequences in secondary forests and 536 permanent plots in old‐growth and managed/logged forests located in 42 countries in Africa, North and South America and Asia. We generated ∆AGB rate estimates for younger secondary forests (≤20 years), older secondary forests (>20 years and up to 100 years) and old‐growth forests, and accounted for uncertainties in our estimates. In tropical rainforests, for which data availability was the highest, our ∆AGB rate estimates ranged from 3.4 (Asia) to 7.6 (Africa) Mg ha−1 year−1 in younger secondary forests, from 2.3 (North and South America) to 3.5 (Africa) Mg ha−1 year−1 in older secondary forests, and 0.7 (Asia) to 1.3 (Africa) Mg ha−1 year−1 in old‐growth forests. We provide a rigorous and traceable refinement of the IPCC 2006 default rates in tropical and subtropical ecological zones, and identify which areas require more research on ∆AGB. In this respect, this study should be considered as an important step towards quantifying the role of tropical and subtropical forests as carbon sinks with higher accuracy; our new rates can be used for large‐scale GHG accounting by governmental bodies, nongovernmental organizations and in scientific research
ISSN: 1365-2486
Appears in Collections:Artículos en revistas indexadas

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
requena_articulo_2019.pdfTexto Completo4,94 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Compartir :

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons